Comments:Door opens mid-Qantas flight; plane makes an emergency landing

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


These incidents come poorly timed for Qantas. They seem to be in the middle of a major advertising campaign in the US, promoting their longevity and safety record. --SVTCobra 22:34, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing they're guilty of, is of buying crappy planes from Boeing. These problems were denounced by the manufacturer's former employees on Sky News... Nobody cared. They were right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.193.205.39 (talk) 09:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here ya go:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041600803.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.193.205.39 (talk) 09:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Qantas, like everyone else, have very tough decisions to make when buying aircraft. Ultimatly, in a tough market that's going to see a lot of collapses in the next few years, Boeing have the edge over Airbus etc. The Russian manufacturers - Sukhoi, Ilyushin - so far as I can see either produce shit or very reliavle aircraft, and it seems to stay the same with each model. So, they need to move in and produce something ceap, efficient and reliable. For some reason, they aren't. Lack of resources? Unlikely, I'm sure there's funding availible. Meantime, Boeing remain a risk worth taking. It can keep your airline from dying where others will... Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 11:40, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, of course... Evil Russians are the ones to blame... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.243.119.191 (talk) 11:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]