Comments:Estimated 300-ton radioactive leak at Fukushima rated 'serious incident' by watchdog
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Wider consequences suggest higher level on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale | 0 | 05:29, 30 August 2013 |
Wider consequences suggest higher level on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale
First, thank you for another quality piece of journalism from Wikinews. Then, relating to subject of this comment, posting at http://www.sciencecodex.com/fukushima_radioactive_plume_to_reach_us_in_3_years-118258 suggests that wider (beyond "local") consequence and higher level on the INES described at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Nuclear_and_Radiological_Event_Scale.