Talk:Estimated 300-ton radioactive leak at Fukushima rated 'serious incident' by watchdog

Review of revision 1977648 [Passed]

Revision 1977648 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1977648 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Headline

Having reread this, the headline sucks. 'radioactive' could be left to the lede, aas could the exact size, and the whole thing could be active; Watchdog rates new Fukushima leak 'serious incident' results. Some you win :D Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 13:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)