Comments:Facebook blocked in Bangladesh
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Comments from feedback form - "everything here is biased... a..."[edit]
everything here is biased... and WRONG! —116.68.204.159 (talk) 05:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
- How so my good friend? 130.56.87.96 (talk) 14:03, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Comments from feedback form - "ok but cud include more info....."[edit]
ok but cud include more info... —202.56.7.148 (talk) 13:29, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Comments from feedback form - "It’s not only because of Proph..." | 1 | 12:51, 1 June 2010 |
| I don't want to sound ignorant but.. | 0 | 03:16, 31 May 2010 |
| Comments from feedback form - "very good, accurate, and infor..." | 0 | 17:44, 30 May 2010 |
It’s not only because of Prophet Mohammed but also because of obnoxious images of current ""Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and the leader of the opposition (in Bangladesh)”" they banned facebook….what a shame.
There are only 556,000 internet users in Bangladesh, I doubt that this is affecting THAT many people. However I do not like the idea that "anti-religious and offensive" material is good means for blocking access to a website, and I feel that it goes against United Nations Internet resolution regarding people having free access to information.