Jump to content

Comments:Naked News presents a new style of news

Add topic
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


Personally, I wonder whether any of their viewers actually care about the news. Matt/TheFearow | userpage | contribs 20:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

At a bare minimum, Matt, I am sure the viewers want to keep abreast of the issues. :) Jcart1534 20:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps Wikinews could bring out Wikinews Naked LOL - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 23:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Problem #1 Female contributors. I am *not* watching DragonFire1024 reading the news in the nude. --Brian McNeil / talk 00:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
That's a problem more of sexual orientation than gender. But in any event, I suspect that males will be more likely to want to watch this sort of thing than females, and since most males are heterosexual, they'll want to see naked females. JoshuaZ 00:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well, Naked News Male did fail afterall ;). --Nzgabriel | Talk 10:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "why don't we have this type of..."

[edit]

why don't we have this type of news in the states? Maybe because Russian woman are so much more bueatiful. —173.161.249.137 (talk) 17:48, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Reply