Comments:Price of crude oil reaches new record high

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rocket on![edit]

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments

The quicker and higher the price rises the sooner the planet moves from a risky fossil fuel based transport system, into a better time and place post-peak oil along with necessary economic contraction, reduced human population and environmental degradation.


The assumption that what follows fossil fuels will be only goodness and light is profoundly glib. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.246.61.1 (talk) 17:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you agree that it's fair to say the planet will be better off post-fossil fuels, though probably not humans? Wikidsoup - (talk) 18:46, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the interesting thing...[edit]

Alternatives are STILL more expensive/more difficult to transport/have less energy per unit volume/have much higher upfront cost than Oil.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Ethanol is still being subsidized via the federal gas tax (along with many other things). This makes Obama's comments regarding the gas tax even more... well. He's right, the tax brake will have no (direct) impact on me (even though my '94 wagon gets 19 mi/gal and 'recommends' 91 octane), but it will have a huge impact on truckers, many of which have yet to pass on their cost of fuel to their customers.

One must ask (Obama) how roads will be funded when we switch to some magical alternative. In terms of taxes, gasoline is the new tobacco. We can never get rid of it because we are dependent on it for tax revenue. QUINTIX - (talk) 14:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see why you wouldn't want the market to sort this out. To think that government would in any fashion would be able or even competent to solve an energy crisis is rather absurd IMHO. Fephisto - (talk) 21:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am pretty sure that Clinton, and not Obama favors the gas tax holiday. So your comments are pretty confusing, Quintix. But what were his comments? Cheers, --SVTCobra 21:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
His comments where that what Clinton and Mccain are proposing (the gas tax holiday) is a political ploy which he opposes. (No citation here again, sorry.) 24.98.235.224 01:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's what I knew/thought but Quintix seems so focused on the long-term that I thought Obama might have said something else regarding the future. --SVTCobra 01:23, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Comments:Price_of_crude_oil_reaches_new_record_high&oldid=633382"