Comments:Record size 17.4 million-digit prime found
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Comments on this page were originally made using the LiquidThreads extension, which is no longer supported. It has since been exported to wikitext, but the export process was not perfect so comments may appear slightly oddly.
Got the Prime numbers right...
Record size 17.4 million-digit prime found
[edit]I sure hope none of my hard earned tax $$$$$ was used to find this number. 70.199.65.135 (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- If it were, 'twould be a good investment. Pi zero (talk) 16:49, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- This is the biggest waste of time. Why does it matter what the largest prime number is? It's contributing nothing to society except useless information and wasting labor and money. Do something useful. 168.9.128.3 (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- agree 100% reader in Virginia ! who really D A S !!! 72.192.213.209 (talk) 00:48, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- This is the biggest waste of time. Why does it matter what the largest prime number is? It's contributing nothing to society except useless information and wasting labor and money. Do something useful. 168.9.128.3 (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)