Comments:Susan G. Komen Foundation reneges on Planned Parenthood funding cuts
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Comments on this page were originally made using the LiquidThreads extension, which is no longer supported. It has since been exported to wikitext, but the export process was not perfect so comments may appear slightly oddly.
BS
yaah save women's lives by killing babies
thanks for the moral boost FreeziezGTM (talk) 21:18, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom isn't always pretty. 150.148.0.65 (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Headline violates NPOV policy
Does not pass NPOV. "Reneges" is a POV term showing editorial bias. 198.228.220.129 (talk) 03:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- The issue was brought up on the article collaboration page (which is a more appropriate place for it).
- Two notes here, as they pertain to the form of the comment here.
- "Violation of policy" seems melodramatic; this was a poor word choice.
- Your use of the word "showing" is also a poor choice. WN:Never assume advises not to needlessly overgeneralize criticisms. The word "suggesting" would have been better, as that addresses the subjective appearance of the title. "Showing" suggests proof of something, and the choice of reneges does not definitively determine why the author chose it. (As reviewer, I hesitated over it, consulted the Wiktionary entry for renege, still wasn't sure, and finally shrugged and let it stand; live and learn, I'll likely be more proactive if presented with a similar situation in future.) Pi zero (talk) 05:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)