Comments:U.S. military denies reports helicopter opened fire on Libyan civilians during rescue mission

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Comments on this page were originally made using the LiquidThreads extension, which is no longer supported. It has since been exported to wikitext, but the export process was not perfect so comments may appear slightly oddly.

Start a new discussion

bunch of liars

if they actually shot civilians, they wouldn't tell, right? like http://www.collateralmurder.com/ , that was acknowledged only after the video was leaked =/ 187.40.219.66 (talk) 21:18, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh hey it's the video of group of journalist walking next to armed men after ambushing US soldiers. 75.74.54.31 (talk) 02:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "no refs"

no refs THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 12:27, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

See above; refs are evil. Brian McNeil / ^talk 16:38, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "why no inline citations like w..."

why no inline citations like wikipedia? fails my sniff test verifiability, etc. i'll stick to reading actual news sites such as bbc, cnn, abcnews, nbcnews, nytimes, daily telegraph, al jazeera, et al.

regards. 96.232.126.111 (talk) 16:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

emend my earlier entry. also, will also just continue to go to wikipedia for the broad, comprehensive picture since wikipedia is heavily sourced with inline citations. 96.232.126.111 (talk) 16:06, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

<laughs> Wikipedia should not be considered reliable. They do no peer review, so you're misinformed as to what constitutes "reliable".

I agree that their articles probably have more detail; that is because they're encyclopedic, not actual news reports. Brian McNeil / ^talk 16:38, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "An Osprey is noy a Helicopter."

An Osprey is noy a Helicopter. Tadpole256 (talk) 16:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)