Comments:US congressman causes controversy by comparing Bush to Hitler

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Latest comment: 16 years ago by SVTCobra in topic Hitler was democratically elected too
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

I find the comments of the Republican congressman even more interesting though, saying it's not right to compare a democratically elected U.S. president with Hitler... as if Hitler was not democratically elected! -- IlyaHaykinson 17:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Agreed Ilya, I had the same thought. People seen to forget that he was elected Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 22:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

thousands or millions?


it seems to me that no matter what the circumstances, people dying is people dying. (Ithink that there rarely seems to be a good reason for violence.) If nothing else, both hitler and bush have called for the slayings of thousands or millions of people, depending on the source. I believe the problems at the base of these murders could have been delt with using non-violence. Hitler's problem with skin color and 'impurity'and bush's problem with terrorism and dictatorships did not NEED to be solved with violence.

As far as the congressman's comparison trivializing the holocaust, I think both are equally important. "If it were your relative who died in the war in iraq, you might see both as equally important." I personally do not know anybody involved in either situation, but still hold human life as well as all life to be the most important thing I can think of. Can you honsetly think of somthing else? - 00:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

its about time someone said this obvious opinion.



You know, as an atheist, I'm really happy to hear a politician publicly say he supports atheists like that. So many others seem to squirm at the thought. This guy just earned some points with me. 17:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hitler was democratically elected too


Don't forget your history... Germany elected Hitler democratically as well; and it was after the Reichstag Fire that Germans allowed him to become dictator (something Bush & company are desparately trying to do).

I see, so just like Hitler, Bush has had all members of the main opposition party arrested. Perhaps you should read a little history instead of spouting what other people have "told" you that the history was. --SVTCobra 02:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

you know hitler was democratically elected also...hail bush.