Comments:US government expands definition of rape to include men
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
YEA! | 0 | 03:53, 12 January 2012 |
Almost as misleading the mainstream media | 1 | 11:10, 8 January 2012 |
WELL ITS ABOUT TIME! HALAUYA! Chaulk one up for the good guys! Thank You to all of the people who worked long & hard for this .
The line "no changes to law" should be first paragraph. All this change means is that the Feds will use simple addition to add up the reports the states send them - instead of adding and then subtracting out cases that didn't meet their old definition. 75.41.110.200 (talk) 02:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
You're not getting it, are you?
The Feds define what the States can, and cannot, report.
So your "thesis" is fundamentally flawed; the States don't send them data on what the FBI does not class as rape.