Comments:Unauthorised autobiography of Julian Assange sells less than 700 copies

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

this is a nice book..............

This isn't an autobigraphy. That title implies Assange wrote it himself. This is a biography, and biographies need not be "authorised".

Nowadays, it's worthy of remark when a celebrity's autobiography isn't written by a ghostwriter. So much so that, afaik, nobody's bothered to coin a retronym for it, though I'd favor self-written autobiography.

name of the autobiography is not mentioned

Wikinews: the place for news about Wikimedia and Wikileaks!

You say that like WikiLeaks actually has something to do with the WMF. In truth, it's barely even a wiki - if at all.

No, otherwise I would have grouped them together.

I maintain that your comment strongly implies it.

Children... please...

If i was him, once realizing i couldn't prevent the publishers from going ahead with the publishing of the material, i would retribute by leaking the contents to try to hurt the sales...

lol...

With all his experience with Wikileaks, did he really thought it would be possible to keep his biography from coming out?