Comments:Wikinews Shorts: January 23, 2012

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Comments on this page were originally made using the LiquidThreads extension, which is no longer supported. It has since been exported to wikitext, but the export process was not perfect so comments may appear slightly oddly.

Start a new discussion

Attributation history

For the attributation history of the story "UK unemployment increases to 2.68m" go here.--08:19, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

This thread is far better suited to the talk page - and, even more, should have been contained in the edit summary when the story was merged in. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 13:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Did that with the New zealand eartquake story on the last shorts, only to have it moved to opinions, so I thought this is where such information was expected to go. Will remember to include an actual link inthe edit summary if I do this again.--KTo288 (talk) 16:53, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm. Don't know why it was moved; talk is for practical discussions about the article, comments is for opinions about the story itself, and edit history is for author attribution. (EDIT: The feedback form for casual readers directs a combination of both forms of discussion onto the comments page, which likely confuses matters.) Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 17:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)