Attributation history

This thread is far better suited to the talk page - and, even more, should have been contained in the edit summary when the story was merged in.

Did that with the New zealand eartquake story on the last shorts, only to have it moved to opinions, so I thought this is where such information was expected to go. Will remember to include an actual link inthe edit summary if I do this again.--KTo288 (talk) 16:53, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm. Don't know why it was moved; talk is for practical discussions about the article, comments is for opinions about the story itself, and edit history is for author attribution. (EDIT: The feedback form for casual readers directs a combination of both forms of discussion onto the comments page, which likely confuses matters.)