Kansas School Board has copyright withheld over teaching Intelligent Design

Monday, October 31, 2005

Kansas has been denied permission to use two key documents commonly used in the writing of science education standards for states, the National Science Education Standards (published by the National Research Council) and Pathways to Science Standards (published by the National Science Teacher Association). The respective organizations argued that they could not grant the state of Kansas permission to use these documents in the current form of the Kansas Science Educational Standards, as these overemphasize controversy between the scientific theory of Evolution and the argument of Intelligent Design. Moreover, the organizations criticize that the standards in their current form distort the definition of science. The American Association for the Advancement of Science has expressed its support for the decision to deny Kansas the use of copyrighted material, as "the proposed standards misrepresent both the content and the standing of evolution as a scientific organizing principle".

Proponents of Intelligent Design have characterized the refusal as "an effort to censor the discussion of scientific criticism of Darwinian theory by intimidation and threat".

This is likely to further delay the ratification of the final vote on the Kansas Science Educational Standards as they will have to be rewritten either to not violate any copyright restrictions or modify their account of evolution and outlook on science. According to University of Kansas professor Steve Case, rewriting the standards will be very difficult, as "there is copyrighted material on every page" of the current document.

This is the second time that Kansas was denied the right to use copyrighted materials in their state standards, following the case in 1999, when Kansas included Creationism, a precursor of Intelligent Design, into the school curriculum. A later school board overturned that directive.

The dispute in Kansas has brought nationwide responses, ranging from a rebuke by the American Association for the Advancement of Science to the creation of internet-sensation Flying Spaghetti Monster mythology (which is lobbying the Kansas School Board to give equal time teaching their creationism theory as well.)

Have an opinion on this story? Share it!

Sources

Wikinews

This article features first-hand journalism by Wikinews members. See the collaboration page for more details.

Wikinews

This article features first-hand journalism by Wikinews members. See the collaboration page for more details.

Jodi Wilgoren. "Kansas Fight on Evolution Escalates" — The New York Times, October 28, 2005

"Kansas Denied Use of National Science Education Standards" — The National Academies, October 27, 2005

National Academy of Sciences and the National Science Teachers Association. "Joint Statement from the National Academy of Sciences and the National Science Teachers Association Regarding the Kansas Science Education Standards (KSES)" — The National Academies, October 27, 2005

Barbara Schaal and Jay Labov. "Review of the Kansas Science Education Standards" — National Academy of Sciences, September 6, 2005

Earl Lane. "AAAS Backs Groups’ Copyright Move Against Kansas School Board" — American Association for the Advancement of Science, October 27, 2005

David Klepper. "Science rules hit a snag" — The Kansas City Star, october 27, 2005

Rick Weiss. "Evolution Debate in Kansas Spurs Battle Over School Materials" — Washington Post, October 28, 2005

"OPEN LETTER TO KANSAS SCHOOL BOARD" — Church of The Flying Spaghetti Monster,

Yudhijit Bhattacharjee Kansas Gears Up for Another Battle Over Teaching Evolution Science, 29 April 2005

"Kansas restores evolution standards for science classes" — CNN, February 14, 2001

Carey Gillam. "Kansas School Board Rejects Evolution" — Washington Post, August 12, 1999

Share this:

This page is archived, and is no longer publicly editable.

Articles presented on Wikinews reflect the specific time at which they were written and published, and do not attempt to encompass events or knowledge which occur or become known after their publication.

Got a correction? Add the template {{editprotected}} to the talk page along with your corrections, and it will be brought to the attention of the administrators.

Please note that due to our archival policy, we will not alter or update the content of articles that are archived, but will only accept requests to make grammatical and formatting corrections.

Note that some listed sources or external links may no longer be available online due to age.