Nauru raises media visa application fee from AU$200 to $8,000
Saturday, January 11, 2014
The Nauru endorsed rise of the cost of an application for single-entry three-month media visa from $200 to $8,000 last Thursday.of the island nation of
The rise followed a scandal last weekend involving 60 Lebanese asylum seekers voluntarily deciding to return home from the , an Australian immigration detention facility, after facing harsh physical conditions and disorientation.
Nauru's Government Information Office Director Joanna Olsson appeared to be unaware that the new visa fee had yet to take effect, writing an email to a visa applicant about the new fee last Tuesday: "Sorry for the late response but yes we are granting media visas. The fee is $8000 per visa, single entry valid for 3 months. The visa fee is not refundable if the application is not successful." She also claimed the new fee had been implemented "a couple [of] months ago", Thereported.
On the contrary, on Thursday during a meeting, Nauru's Principal Immigration Officer Ernest Stephen said the price change was "not official" and the price rise had not yet passed into law through the. Stephen said only three or four Nauru media visas were granted last year.
A member of Nauru Opposition Group, Mathew Batsiua, claimed the move was an oppression of journalistic freedom. "They [the Nauru authorities] certainly bully our local media in terms of what they can show, who they can interview, and this is another illustration of that kind of behaviour in terms of bullying media and avoiding accountability. ... This hiking up of fees for journalists coming in to Nauru is a step in that direction, and we think that it's the wrong move and we're certainly opposing it."
The rise of the visa fee followed a recent scandal involving the majority of 60 Lebanese asylum seekers, targeted by people smugglers, deciding to return home from the Nauru and neighbouringdetention centres after a discussion with Australian government adviser Jamal Rifi on the weekend of January 4.
The(UNHCR) reviewed the detention centre in December 2012, reporting poor physical conditions:
The conditions at the closed and congested detention centre [are] harsh, with little natural shelter from the heat during the day. These conditions are aggravated by noise and dust from the construction of the permanent facility.
– UNHCR, 2012
The UNHCR has also cited delays processing the refugee applications, lack of legal counseling, health issues including trauma and mental health cases, and responsibility of both Australia and Nauru for the treatment. In another review in November last year, UHCR reported improved physical conditions while criticizing progress on reception conditions and refugee applications processing.
Yesterday Australian officials told a Pakistani refugee living in Australia that a refugee application could take up to ten years to process, while he was applying for refuge for his brothers following death of his parents and wife in Pakistan.
- "UN adds to criticism of Australian offshore centers" — Wikinews, February 5, 2013
- "Hazara refugee fears for brothers' lives after family reunion applications pushed to back of queue" — , January 10, 2014
- Jonathan Swan. "Nauru to charge Australians $8000 to report on asylum seekers" — , January 9, 2014
- "Nauru media visa fee hike to 'cover up harsh conditions at Australian tax-payer funded detention centre'" — , January 9, 2014
- Sarah Dingle. "Lebanese asylum seekers in detention on Nauru and Manus Island consider returning home voluntarily" — , January 6, 2014
- Adrian Edwards. "Men, women and children suffering from harsh physical conditions and legal shortcomings at Pacific Island asylum centres: UNHCR reports" — , November 26, 2013
- "UNHCR releases report critical of Nauru processing centre" — , December 14, 2012