Talk:Australia makes changes to Boxing Day cricket test team

I'm not sure if Boxing Day should be capitalized. Bawolff ☺☻ 07:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

I think it should be.....every where else has it that way Bjornengelhardt (talk) 10:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Review

Revision 745252 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 07:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: "after South Africa chased down an almost record 414 in their second innings." Where does this information come from? I can't find any mention of "record" or "414" in any of the sources. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Just needs that one bit of backing and it is good to go from what I see --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 07:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 745252 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 07:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: "after South Africa chased down an almost record 414 in their second innings." Where does this information come from? I can't find any mention of "record" or "414" in any of the sources. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Just needs that one bit of backing and it is good to go from what I see --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 07:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review 2

Revision 745443 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:35, 26 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Please check the style guide on how to format the source names. Www.something.whatever is not the correct way.--ShakataGaNai ^_^ 22:35, 26 December 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 745443 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:35, 26 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Please check the style guide on how to format the source names. Www.something.whatever is not the correct way.--ShakataGaNai ^_^ 22:35, 26 December 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.