Talk:Australian rules football: 2010 Gippsland Football League round 11 - Wonthaggi v Traralgon

14.16-100 Morwell def. Leongatha 7.10-52
12.20-92 Sale def. Warragul 2.6-18
8.13-61 Wonthaggi Power def. by Traralgon 13.13-91
6.6-42 Moe def. by Maffra 13.15-93

POS TEAM  	P  	W  	L  	D  	FF  	For  	Agst  	%  	PTS
1   Maffra 	10 	9 	1 	0 	0 	1194 	655 	182.29 	36
2   Traralgon 	10 	8 	2 	0 	0 	1009 	761 	132.59 	32
3   Morwell 	10 	7 	3 	0 	0 	1035 	838 	123.51 	28
4   Moe 	10 	5 	5 	0 	0 	906 	870 	104.14 	20
5   Drouin 	9 	4 	5 	0 	0 	865 	721 	119.97 	16
6   Sale 	9 	4 	5 	0 	0 	748 	665 	112.48 	16
7   Leongatha 	10 	4 	6 	0 	0 	740 	821 	90.13 	16
8   Wonthaggi  	10 	3 	7 	0 	0 	598 	1024 	58.40 	12
9   Warragul 	10 	0 	10 	0 	0 	468 	1208 	38.74 	0

'MSN Transcript

Pattman says:
 good game of footy yesterday?
Mr Football says:
 frist ququter goal to goal
Pattman says:
 then traralgon pulled from there?
Mr Football says:
 what mean
Pattman says:
 went on to win by the five goals
Mr Football says:
 2 quqther went 7 and 1 goal 
Pattman says:
 wonthaggi must have done well in the second half then?
Mr Football says:
 yea kick 4 goal to 3 in 3 ququther
Pattman says:
 fourth quarter goal for goal then?
Mr Football says:
 not reaLLY
Pattman says:
 ?
Mr Football says:
 1 GOAL PEST 
Pattman says:
 1 goal a peice?
Mr Football says:
 YEAH
 SORRY
Pattman says:
 that's cool

--RockerballAustralia c 04:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1051387 [Passed]

Revision 1051387 of this article has been reviewed by InfantGorilla (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: All looks fine. Hope my copyedits work for you. (Shame there is no photo this round.) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1051387 of this article has been reviewed by InfantGorilla (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: All looks fine. Hope my copyedits work for you. (Shame there is no photo this round.) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.