Talk:British 4G mobile spectrum auction underway

Review of revision 1783755 [Not ready]

Revision 1783755 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: This got underway when? It is summer in Australia so I assume this is almost over? Remember international audience and to include dates. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: "Many people" Who are they? Parts of this honestly sound a bit like an advertisement for 4G. Style: Not ready: Pictures are not credited. There are lists in bullet form when prose is preferable. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1783755 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: This got underway when? It is summer in Australia so I assume this is almost over? Remember international audience and to include dates. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: "Many people" Who are they? Parts of this honestly sound a bit like an advertisement for 4G. Style: Not ready: Pictures are not credited. There are lists in bullet form when prose is preferable. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1785351 [Not ready]

Revision 1785351 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:35, 25 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Still doesn't say when the spectrum auction got underway. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: LauraHale already requested that you explain when the auction started. This is important to ascertaining newsworthiness. Please fix the issues LauraHale raised. I've fixed a few things, but I can't fix everything. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1785351 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:35, 25 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Still doesn't say when the spectrum auction got underway. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: LauraHale already requested that you explain when the auction started. This is important to ascertaining newsworthiness. Please fix the issues LauraHale raised. I've fixed a few things, but I can't fix everything. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

BT

Are BT really a "current mobile network operator"? --Computron (talk) 20:55, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

No. That was silly of me to approve that. I'll fix that. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

I'll try and be more meticulous when writing, I see that v. specific detail matters like the dates and the way things are phrased. --Computron (talk) 21:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Just thinking, they are bidding so maybe that first bit needs rephrasing? --Computron (talk) 21:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Ahh OK, that will do. :) --Computron (talk) 21:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Good, you are getting an eye for details that I missed. That's good. We both kind of screwed up, but caught it. Screwing up and fixing it is how we learn. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1785541 [Passed]

Revision 1785541 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1785541 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

To 4G or not to 4G

Yeah, except that LTE is not 4G, is more like 3.9G. LTE Advanced is 4G. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTE_(telecommunication) -- 84.159.176.60 (talk) 12:54, 26 January 2013 (UTC)