Talk:Bronx, New York church destroyed in suspicious blaze

Review of revision 973309 [Passed]

Revision 973309 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 973309 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Use of the term "destroyed"

Local news reports say that the church was only damaged, not destroyed, by the fire. Even then, reports say that only the front entrance was damaged. Cocoaguy^talk_contribs‽ 04:45, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Looks destroyed here, although the term usage was purely subjective; it could be interpreted multiple ways. I wouldn't object to using the words, "damaged" or "burned". Blurpeace 05:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)