Talk:Catholic pilgrimage in Donglü blocked by Chinese police again

Review of revision 1909317 [Not ready]

Revision 1909317 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:20, 26 May 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: Article needs two sources atleast. This only has one. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1909317 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:20, 26 May 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: Article needs two sources atleast. This only has one. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1910129 [Passed]

Revision 1910129 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: There was a lot I had to take out because I couldn't find it in the sources. The reporter may have been looking at another source, IDK. It now barely scrapes style guide because of length. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1910129 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: There was a lot I had to take out because I couldn't find it in the sources. The reporter may have been looking at another source, IDK. It now barely scrapes style guide because of length. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.