Talk:Despite defectors, U.S. electoral college affirms Trump presidency

Review of revision 4271494 [Passed]

Revision 4271494 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: That was a fair few sources for a short piece, which can't always be helped, and also a fairly short article for a subject heavily covered already in Western media. Of course, it can still be nice to have articles like this to draw details from quickly in the future when writing other pieces. Remember to write for an international audience. The US electoral college is a bizarre thing to non-USians, and could have used some explaining. "Faithless elector" and "Keystone Pipeline" were decipherable from context but could also have been beefed up a little. The writing itself, however, is very good. These are ultimately minor if wordy pieces of feedback. Be in no doubt, I'm very glad to have you about. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4271494 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: That was a fair few sources for a short piece, which can't always be helped, and also a fairly short article for a subject heavily covered already in Western media. Of course, it can still be nice to have articles like this to draw details from quickly in the future when writing other pieces. Remember to write for an international audience. The US electoral college is a bizarre thing to non-USians, and could have used some explaining. "Faithless elector" and "Keystone Pipeline" were decipherable from context but could also have been beefed up a little. The writing itself, however, is very good. These are ultimately minor if wordy pieces of feedback. Be in no doubt, I'm very glad to have you about. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.