Talk:Domestic economic impacts likely after Japanese earthquake

Review of revision 1194069 [Failed]

Revision 1194069 of this article has been reviewed by Wackywace (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:58, 13 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: The Nomura Group quote is not sourced. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The quote from the Nomura Group is not sourced, but when it is this should be fine for publication. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1194069 of this article has been reviewed by Wackywace (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:58, 13 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: The Nomura Group quote is not sourced. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The quote from the Nomura Group is not sourced, but when it is this should be fine for publication. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Yes it is. Right at the top of the second page of the Reuters article. "'The Japanese economy is now likely to take longer than we expected to exit its current lull. We had projected an April-June exit but now forecast July-September or possibly October-December,' Nomura said in a note to clients." [1] C628 (talk) 20:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Ah, so it is. I didn't see the article was two pages, sorry. wackywace 20:03, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

No problem. It'd probably be good if there was some way for the source template to include multiple pages, but I don't know of one. C628 (talk) 20:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1194086 [Passed]

Revision 1194086 of this article has been reviewed by Wackywace (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1194086 of this article has been reviewed by Wackywace (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.