Talk:EU may see no reason to go to next major emitters meeting

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

OR notes[edit]

Got the Greenpeace press release by email (as all media participants I think) Watched the two press conferences while they were being held via live feed.

Can you paste the body of the e-mail here in the notes, please? --SVTCobra 12:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I was worried about copyright issues. I´ll post the sentence I refer to, and if anybody wants the full, I´ll gladly email it to them.

Greenpeace congratulates German Environment Minister Gabriele for his statement just now to the German press that the EU Major Emitters will not attend Bush's Major Economies Meeting in Hawaii in January without substantive progress at this meeting in Bali.

"This is the leadership we want to see from the EU here in Bali," said Tobias Muenchmeyer of Greenpeace Germany. "let's see now if the US will start acting positively".

Sorry for taking so long to answer, I was watching Al Gores speech (was pretty popular and I thought quite good). I'm checking the G77+China press conference now, if they dont remark on the Major emitter meeting, I think I/we should remove the breaking, as the US (or anybody else from the Umbrella group) doesn't seem to be responding in any official manner. Sean Heron 13:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't worry about copyright in this case. Greenpeace encourages the reproduction and distribution of all original materials and this is just our "work" area, not our published material (though anyone can view it, so that might not hold up in court - ianal). Cheers, --SVTCobra 13:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

G77 meeting is later (in two hours), and I guess thez wont refer to the EUs thing anywaz, so removed breaking. Sean Heron 13:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


'Category:EU' should be replaced with 'Category:European Union'. Van der Hoorn (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Tempo di Valse ♪ 14:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]