Talk:Earthquake strikes Melbourne, no reports of injuries

issues

First it says "No injuries or property damages were reported", then it says "It is reported as minor damage". This seems to be contradictory. Otherwise the story looks good. Bawolff ☺☻ 00:05, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Looks like DragonFire fixed it. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 00:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Peer review

Revision 778346 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 778346 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

cat please

Please add [[Category:Melbourne]]. --InfantGorilla (talk) 11:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Done Bawolff ☺☻