Talk:Expedition 33 crew returns to Earth
Add topicReviewer notes
[edit]- Plagiarism check with this and this with a manual check of sources reveals no cause for concerns.
- Article has two sources to demonstrate newsworthiness of topic.
- Image for the article has an acceptable copyright and is credited.
- I manually wikified some of the things myself. I also fixed some grammatical errors. These were minor and did create content changes. --LauraHale (talk) 09:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Time zone issues left as is because USA sources and yeah. Sources support Monday landing in Russia/Sunday USA so going with Russian time, which makes sources look weird but whatever.
- I believe the newsworthiness of this is established, but possibly just a bit because soyuz space stuff means it is almost automatically newsworthy.
- Article is written in inverted pyramid style.
- First paragraph sourcing checks out.
- Second paragraph sourcing checks out.
- Third paragraph ran into problems with " first commercial shipment made by SpaceX's Dragon cargo" not appearing to be supported by sources. --LauraHale (talk) 09:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Primary contributor was on IRC, where I raised the name issue and the sourcing issue. These were fixed. Plagiarism check and manual check show no cause for concerns. SpaceX is according to one source commercial and it says first of this kind of delivery so yes, I believe supported.
- "microgravity on the human spine and ice cap studies." is not supported by sources. Seeking clarity on IRC. --LauraHale (talk) 10:06, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Sought clarity. Source added. Plagiarism check and manual check reveals no cause for concerns. --LauraHale (talk) 10:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
[21:16] purplepopple: Where is the part about the spines in reuters?
[21:17] purplepopple: melting glaciers also doesn't necessarily equal ice caps.
[21:18] sgp4: yeah... I figured you'd say that as I looked back on it XD
[21:18] purplepopple: sgp4: Text change to reflect that? :)
[21:18] sgp4: for sure!
[21:18] purplepopple: Thanks. :)
[21:19] purplepopple: Let me know when done.
[21:25] sgp4: purplepopple: edited, included another source, spine bit is third paragraph from bottom.
Posted excerpt after asking because yes, lots of changes during the review. :) --LauraHale (talk) 10:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- plagiarism check and spot check shows no problems. "cluding the effects of microgravity on the human spine and studying melting glaciers" is now supported by a source. Rest of article is supported by sources.
- Article reads as neutral enough. Article appears to be written in active voice per requirement. --LauraHale (talk) 10:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Review of revision 1703287 [Passed]
[edit]  |
Revision 1703287 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: A review of these criteria was done on Talk:Expedition 33 crew returns to Earth in consultation with first time author to address verifiability issues, minor formatting and tweaking. This looks like a really good first article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1703287 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: A review of these criteria was done on Talk:Expedition 33 crew returns to Earth in consultation with first time author to address verifiability issues, minor formatting and tweaking. This looks like a really good first article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |