Talk:Fifth-graders have sex in class, charged with obscenity

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Looks scarily similar to the actual AP story... —Zachary talk 11:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

u're right on the spot. thanks for picking up on it. –Doldrums(talk) 11:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I think if we revert to this revision, it would be okay (the next revision was the copied text). —Zachary talk 11:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
If there is a copyvio in the version history then it should be oversighted. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
i don't think hiding the revisions is necessary. ensuring we don't publish a revision which is copyvio is enough. the policy calles for "Removal of copyright infringement on the advice of Wikimedia Foundation counsel."[italics mine]. don't think its necessary otherwise. there's also the alternative of deleting the article and restoring only non-copyvio version. "Oversight is for material that should not be available even to an admin." –Doldrums(talk) 13:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Since the copyvio material was made after my original story, I'd say we revert to the diff above.  Thunderhead  ►  20:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
If there's no objection, I'll go ahead and do that.  Thunderhead  ►  20:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and restore the non-copyvio versions. --Brian McNeil / talk 20:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Done.  Thunderhead  ►  20:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


Umm yeah we need more than 1 source and obcenity is not a felony. 14:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)