Talk:Former NZ Prime Minister confirmed as head of UNDP
 |
Revision 796218 of this article has been reviewed by Spshu (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: As far as the third ranking position, according to Wikipedia article it is unofficial considered but it is being reported, Spshu (talk) 20:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 796218 of this article has been reviewed by Spshu (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: As far as the third ranking position, according to Wikipedia article it is unofficial considered but it is being reported, Spshu (talk) 20:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
My first review, so I though I would let some double check it. Spshu (talk) 20:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Please Ignore above review. Appearently, reviews are for editor level contributors. —Spshu (talk) 18:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
New Review[edit]
 |
Revision 797757 of this article has been reviewed by Mike Halterman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Since the article was perfect apart from the Wikipedia copying issue, I chopped that part out myself as copyeditor and reworded it into one sentence in the lead. I have since passed it as that issue has been resolved. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 797757 of this article has been reviewed by Mike Halterman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Since the article was perfect apart from the Wikipedia copying issue, I chopped that part out myself as copyeditor and reworded it into one sentence in the lead. I have since passed it as that issue has been resolved. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |