Talk:Hurricane Paloma hits Cuba
Add topicNote
[edit]Much of the last two paragraphs is based on text added in this Wikipedia edit, with the user who made the edit agreeing to that at this page. Anonymous101talk 08:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- It has now already hit Cuba. It needs to be updated before it can be published. Mike Halterman (talk) 08:29, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- OK. Anonymous101talk 08:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- You've listed Wikipedia as a source. Have you backed up the stuff in there with other sources in the sources section? Wikipedia is unreliable, we can just take the text from there as noted above. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 11:17, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, the vast majority (possibly all) of the facts are backed up by other sources Anonymous101talk 12:44, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Fixed. All the facts from WP have either bebn cited or removed. Anonymous101talk 13:53, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Revision 723320 of this article has been reviewed by Samekh (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Looks good. Is definitely newsworthy. Take caution in future when using Wikipedia, as not everything that's there is reliable (as well all know :) ). סּ Talk 14:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 723320 of this article has been reviewed by Samekh (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Looks good. Is definitely newsworthy. Take caution in future when using Wikipedia, as not everything that's there is reliable (as well all know :) ). סּ Talk 14:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |