Talk:Hurricanes may be associated with sunspots

Review

Revision 703349 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Newsworthiness: Not ready: Stale, newest source is 4 days old. Verifiability: Not ready: Unknown - Cant access the nature.com article NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Well there is only a single "Source" (which can't be accessed) & 2 "References". #2 Ref is to abstract only. If you are using this information as a source, put it under such. Comments by reviewer: Bit awkward. Mentions decrease in sunspots = increase in huricanes 3 times. "that there will a 10 % decrease" makes it sound 100% sure. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 703349 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Newsworthiness: Not ready: Stale, newest source is 4 days old. Verifiability: Not ready: Unknown - Cant access the nature.com article NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Well there is only a single "Source" (which can't be accessed) & 2 "References". #2 Ref is to abstract only. If you are using this information as a source, put it under such. Comments by reviewer: Bit awkward. Mentions decrease in sunspots = increase in huricanes 3 times. "that there will a 10 % decrease" makes it sound 100% sure. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Waiting for the second review. Thanks.-- Tharikrish^Talk 15:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

References & casually added sources

1. References is not a valid Wikinews section header. It should be external links.
2. Sources should not be added which no content is drawn from. This is apparent here as one edit adds these sources with no changes to the article body to evidence they have been used.

--Brian McNeil / ^talk 13:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Done (?)-- Tharikrish^Talk 14:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

review 2

Revision 703533 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Still reads rough in some areas & still stale - but seeing is how "busy" things have been the last 24 hours... --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 00:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 703533 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Still reads rough in some areas & still stale - but seeing is how "busy" things have been the last 24 hours... --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 00:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.