Talk:Illinois Governor Blagojevich appoints Roland Burris for vacated U.S. Senate seat

Revision 746628 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: The inverted pyramid is toppling over, because a block is missing... the "why" block, why did Blago appoint Burris? Comments by reviewer: More or less, just flesh it out some more, and include some stuff from the press conference to satisfy the "why" part. TUFKAAP (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 746628 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: The inverted pyramid is toppling over, because a block is missing... the "why" block, why did Blago appoint Burris? Comments by reviewer: More or less, just flesh it out some more, and include some stuff from the press conference to satisfy the "why" part. TUFKAAP (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review 2

Revision 747722 of this article has been reviewed by Poisonous (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The OR issue was resolved and I see no reason the information on why the appointment was made should be included when no one really knows. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 747722 of this article has been reviewed by Poisonous (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The OR issue was resolved and I see no reason the information on why the appointment was made should be included when no one really knows. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.