Talk:Indiana Department of Homeland Security violates Wikipedia copyright

OR notes

I wrote this article based on the PDF and original Wikipedia post. I am also contacting the deputy head of Kansas Homeland Security for a statement. Dendodge _T\^C 20:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Why Kansas? What do they have to do with Indiana? 75.168.140.67 (talk) 22:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

We have their contact details, and it would be interesting to see what another state thinks. Dendodge _T\^C 22:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh. That was me by the way. I can confirm via the scoop that emails were sent. Calebrw (talk) 22:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Indiana Department of Homeland Security

An attempt to contact Indiana Department of Homeland Security (Kansas???) should be made, to receive a comment from them, before this is allowed to be published. Cirt (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Kansas was my idea, purely on the basis I happened to have contact for someone fairly senior and 'I'm sticking by them' or 'I think this is highly unprofessional of this state' would be very interesting. I did mention we need to go through the front door for Indiana; I don't know if that's been done. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 20:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

http://www.in.gov/dhs/ = contact info is that way... Cirt (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Dendodge: Done that yet? If not, I'm happy to. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 20:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Just contacted Media Relations a second ago. Dendodge _T\^C 20:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks! Cirt (talk) 20:23, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Kansas? Why bother Kansas? They have no jurisdiction over Indiana. If anything, the United States Department of Homeland Security should have been contacted...Smallman12q (talk) 21:10, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Like I said, be interesting if he kicks his fellows in the nuts over this. If it was going through the press address, then no, but I already had contact details for someone at the top. His opinion on this is news - or has the potential to be. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

List terms

Perhaps the terms that were copied should be listed somewhere?Smallman12q (talk) 20:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

You seem to know your way around this best. If you'd like to put together a list (either here or in the article), I'm sure we can do something with it. If you can't I maybe could, but it would most likely take me a lot longer. Dendodge _T\^C 21:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

It might be best, considering you are mentioned in the article, that you post it on this talk page, not in the article itself. — μ 21:26, Sunday January 31 2010 (UTC)

I did wonder about that. It probably would be better, but I'm not sure it's a big deal, TBH. Dendodge _T\^C 21:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Taken from my village pump post... It uses 7 terms from Wikipedia: Racial Profiling, USA PATRIOT Act, Bigotry, Internment, Terrorism, Counter-terrorism, The War on Terrorism.
(For those who can't count)

1. Racial Profiling
2. USA PATRIOT Act
3. Bigotry
4. Internment
5. Terrorism
6. Counter-terrorism
7. The War on Terrorism

Smallman12q (talk) 21:45, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

That's in paragraph 2. Dendodge _T\^C 22:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

=D.Smallman12q (talk) 01:50, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Pulled

The PDF link goes to a 404... go us. — μ 10:55, Tuesday February 2 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 950456 [Passed]

Revision 950456 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 950456 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Comment for sources

Could someone please add to the "sources" section a link to my comments at User talk:Dendodge/Jan 10#RFC for Indiana Department of Homeland Security violates Wikipedia copyright from which the quotes are taken? Thanks!Smallman12q (talk) 23:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Question...

I couldn't see on the user page if "smallman12q" was infact male (The article uses "he"). Is this correct? 150.250.43.209 (talk) 04:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I guessed based on the "man" part of his name, and he has spoken to me on my talk page, as well as reading and commenting on this article, so I presume he would have corrected me had he, in fact, been a she. Δενδοδγε _τ\^c 12:30, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

As the name implies, smallman12q is indeed a he=D.Smallman12q (talk) 22:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC)