Talk:Japanese PM Kishida visits India, discusses business partnership

Review of revision 4668523 [Passed]

Revision 4668523 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Awkward wording: "attempts to test nuclear-capable ballistic missiles were also frowned upon"; "The situation [...] was also a matter of discussion", needs to be resolved. Also, much of this was a simple reword of the press release. This is getting approved because it's factually correct and not paraphrasing, and includes some info from other sources—but do recognise we are not here to parrot the government line. This can be avoided by incorporating some contextual details...for instance, Reuters has info about past deals, Japan-India investment; Nippon News & Reuters has quotes. All of this is what gives a news story value over simply reading government releases. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4668523 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Awkward wording: "attempts to test nuclear-capable ballistic missiles were also frowned upon"; "The situation [...] was also a matter of discussion", needs to be resolved. Also, much of this was a simple reword of the press release. This is getting approved because it's factually correct and not paraphrasing, and includes some info from other sources—but do recognise we are not here to parrot the government line. This can be avoided by incorporating some contextual details...for instance, Reuters has info about past deals, Japan-India investment; Nippon News & Reuters has quotes. All of this is what gives a news story value over simply reading government releases. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

@SVTCobra, check this version of the article 2006nishan178713^t@lk 08:45, 21 March 2022 (UTC)