Jump to content

Talk:Jet Blue airliner lands with broken nose gear

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Gopher65 in topic Editprotected request

There's no sources listed so I took out the {{publish}} and put {{sources}}Bawolff 00:24, 22 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sorry.. This was my first post.

Put more source info in

This is real. Watching live ABC coverage. Added ABC link. --Dweekly 00:47, 22 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, me was doing the same thing during my last 3 edits. Watching the landing and recording results. Veritos 16:22, 22 September 2005 (UTC)Reply
Ended up being a very nice article. Do you think It should be in category:Disasters and accidents since it almost was a disaster, but no one got hurt? Bawolff 22:00, 22 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Can someone get information on the nose wheel of the A320? I'm just wondering if it turns to the side when it retracts. That could explain how it came to be turned like it was. Imroy 22:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Why can't I find the name of the captains anywhere? They should definitely be mentioned.

The nose gear does NOT turn during retraction. A previous "I think America West" Airbus A320 did the same thing a few years ago. It was determined that a hydraulic o-ring failed on one side hydraulic cylinder causing all the hydraulic pressure to divert to one side only. "Thus locking the wheel in one direction." A service bulletin was issued to replace the o-rings with a new and improved design. The Jet Blue A320 is less than 6 months old and should have been built with the new design o-rings. "A side note: The airplane is new enough that all repairs should be covered at Airbus' expense."

Editprotected request

[edit]

{{editprotected}}
Hello, could someone please remove the ugly brown box above the archive template? It looks like the template wasn't formatted correctly. Thanks, -- ♪TempoDiValse♪  00:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done Gopher65talk 00:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply