Talk:Judge orders U.S. Department of Justice officials to testify

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NPOV[edit]

This article is about a suit against the US government's actions over the previous 123 years of practice. It is extremely biased to state it is an accusation of a single previous official based on this case. The case may be very newsworthy, the ambassador's involvement is not. - Amgine | talk en.WN 00:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. the source article is completely about the Ambassador?? 70.48.206.17 18:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit rather than tag[edit]

Please edit the article rather than tag it. 70.48.204.14 04:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What are the objections? Strange burial of this story as it seems rather benign albeit interesting to the people of USA and Austalia perhaps. 70.48.204.14 04:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The objection appears to be that this article focusses on one person involved with a US court case which actually involves hundreds of people. There is no reason to focus on just this one person. - Borofkin 04:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Located older article [1] which indicates that only McCallum and 5 others were singled out for investigation. As the new Sydney article indicates, the ethics violations trial is ongoing. 70.48.204.127 11:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a good story[edit]

It shows that the new Ambassador to Australia is currently before the courts for ethics violations which the Sydney paper brings out into the current news spotlight. Unless most people were aware of that, it seems quite newsworthy. I will include the older article as a background source. 70.48.204.127 11:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked?[edit]

I was just blocked and accused of being nutralizer editor. I am not that editor. Is the article not to be improved? I give up. 70.48.206.182 12:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

new development[edit]

those working on this article may also be interested in this new development[2]. Doldrums 12:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Publish agian[edit]

Was Publyshed june 2 after Deprify's work but must be mistake today-no talk and unpublish? I will publish now. Hope ok? Yrtsihpos 02:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Judge_orders_U.S._Department_of_Justice_officials_to_testify&oldid=263367"