Talk:Large fireball observed after object strikes Jupiter

Review of revision 1037998 [Passed]

Revision 1037998 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1037998 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

How can date "June 3 at 2031 UTC" be valid? It is a future date and can not be found in the references. The closes thing it comes to is "June 3 at 4:31 p.m. ET" from NAT GEO. Hspaans (talk) 09:18, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

How is that a future date? the only thing I can think of is you're thinking "2031" is a year when it's a timestamp (8:31pm UTC).Randal6546 (talk) 16:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

It is only a matter of time before Earth gets hit by one and we all die Benmyers31 (talk) 02:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)