Talk:Magazine closures, cuts, for January 5-9, 2009

Revision 750162 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: I just don't understand the Ricardo story. What on Earth has National Rugby Post got to do with it? It is a complete non-sequiter. If you are trying to list Canadian magazine collapses, then that fails newsworthyness as the others are all old news. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 750162 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: I just don't understand the Ricardo story. What on Earth has National Rugby Post got to do with it? It is a complete non-sequiter. If you are trying to list Canadian magazine collapses, then that fails newsworthyness as the others are all old news. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revised, please re-review. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision 750622 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 750622 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Typo

{{editprotected}}
"personel" => "personnel" Van der Hoorn (talk) 23:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Done ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 22:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)