Jump to content

Talk:Mass delivery of anti-Islamic DVDs in swing voting states

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Poisonous in topic Ungrammatical

Having a hard time keeping it neutral, I can't find any positive articles. --Poisonous (talk) 23:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Want to upload this image and use it on the article but can't because I'm a new user. Can anyone help me out? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:ObsessionRadicalIslam.jpg --Poisonous (talk) 02:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I recognize this is a very hard article to keep neutral, and you're doing a great job, but i noticed, when I read the intro it seemed to imply that all pro-isreal movements were anti-islam, which is biased. (although if some pro-isreal groups were associated with this, i guess the statement in article is technically true, but it seems to imply something more beyond what the statement literally states). Bawolff 05:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
There's religious conflict between Israel and Pakistan and the other Islamic countries, so it being quietly Israeli definitely shows there's an ultierior motive in my opinion. If you feel otherwise though, change it? :) --Poisonous (talk) 05:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

@ 65's edit that I undid, my reason was: "Your statement repeats the quote just before it and replaces a statement that came from the filmmakers/group itself. Either delete or don't repeat. :)" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poisonous (talkcontribs) 03:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Review

[edit]

Ungrammatical

[edit]
According to the Council on American-Islamic Relationships, which has received a large amount of calls over the matter, the Muslims feel it is "an attempt to not only marginalize and demonize the American Muslim community". The Council believes the distribution of the DVD is an attempt to sway voters.

Change this to a full quote, please. Shii (talk) 07:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fixed :) --Poisonous (talk) 08:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply