Talk:Michael Moore's new film 'Sicko' leaked via P2P

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search


It would appear that the torrent is indeed genuine and the film has been leaked. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, the leak is real...


I've tagged this OR as verified it wasn't a fake link, and I watched the film and based the last section on it. Feel free to remove the tag if you don't think that qualifies. --Brian McNeil / talk 10:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I think it qualifies...I just want to see it now too :) DragonFire1024 10:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


Except for the opening sentence, nothing in this article seems to be about the leaking of this film. --SVTCobra 11:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

That was the title originally given to it - any suggestions for an alternative? I would say thought that the leak is the important part of the story. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't know, but it seems almost like two different articles here, with the longer of the two not mentioned in the headline. --SVTCobra 13:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
The article has more of a feel of being about the investigation of the Cuban portion of the movie than about the leaking of the movie. 15:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Is there any chance that the two events were connected. In other words, was this intentionally leaked in order to make any attempt at US confiscation futile? 15:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


Twice there are references to an investigation. Once when explaining why Moore stored a copy in Canada, the second when Boies comes up with a motive for the investigation. But NOT ONCE is the investigation actually described or mentioned otherwise. Who is investigating? What are the possible charges? Is the film being investigated or is Michael Moore? This article needs some cleanup. --SVTCobra 12:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I dug of the old source that it is the U.S. Treasure dept. Investigating him. I added the treasure information, but the fact that he is being targeted is listed in the section from his lawyer. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)