Talk:Microsoft releases Internet Explorer 9 browser

What about this link dated March 15: Microsoft Releases Internet Explorer 9, Makes a Strong Case for Business Users, concludes: "IE9 as a Consumer Browser -- Not Worth It" Mattisse (talk) 21:06, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I added that. Beep21 (talk) 21:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notnews template[edit]

This article was marked with {{notnews}}. I revised the article and removed the template when submitting for review. Beep21 (talk) 22:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

This is newsworthy.
It needs more content.
Can we find more references? The ones here aren't mainstream.
How about some coverage of the features, complaints against IE, IE6 countdown, competition?
More NPOV, please.

--theMONO 23:54, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added a link to the article about the IE6 Countdown and found an article from BBC to cite, but I don't understand how it's lacking in NPOV. Beep21 (talk) 00:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Microsoft waits for death of Internet Explorer 6 May be helpful. Mattisse (talk) 00:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some content, copyedited. Looks pretty good. theMONO 01:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review of revision 1196962 [Passed][edit]

Revision 1196962 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Copyright: Passed
Newsworthiness: Passed
Verifiability: Passed
NPOV: Passed
Style: Passed

Comments by reviewer: This close to being stale, but I'm willing to pass it.

The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.