Talk:Mountaineers 'Climb Up' for AIDS funding

Hi. My name is Jim Luce and I write for the Huffington Post. The copyright belongs to me, except that my lawyer has advised me to add: I, Jim Luce, contribute the above article to the public domain.

I would would like to learn how I can also contribute my work to Wikipedia?

For example, see: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-luce/mountaineers-climb-up-so_b_186976.html

(Orignally added to the article page by USER: Jimluce and moved by Calebrw (talk))

Some cleanup done, will try to do more. —Calebrw (talk) 22:26, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Done a bit more, but still needs work in accordance with WN:SG. Calebrw (talk) 23:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

And how are we supposed to know this person is who they say they are? DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 23:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Dragon Fire - although I am new to Wiki, I can tell you about myself. My name is Jim Luce. I write for the Huffington Post (www.huffingtonpost/jim-luce) where I write on "Thought Leaders and Global Citizens."

I have a freelance contract with the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/12/giving/12essay.html?ex=1352523600&en=4376f3fa6bc6c863&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink).

I have a significant presence on LinkedIn and Facebook and a small following on Twitter. My personal website is www.jimluce.com.

I am the Founder & C.E.O. of ORPHANS INTERNATIONAL WORLDWIDE (www.oiww.org) ("Raising Global Citizens on Three Continents"), associated with the U.N. Dept. of Public Information.

I am a Managing Director of LUCETEC, a division of Elite Group International (www.lucetec.com)("Technology with a Conscience").

I am president & C.E.O. of the JAMES J.D. LUCE FOUNDATION (www.lucefoundation.org)("Funding an End to Orphanages, Globally"). I hope this helps introduce myself.

Jason, both Brian and I have been in contact with Jim via e-mail. —Calebrw (talk) 00:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok then :) DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 01:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Review?

This article has come along way. I hope the reviewer does a really thorough review of this article. Also, remember to update the date to the 21st. Looks like Brian did that.

I would like to see Jim's comments on how it looks, but that is obviously not necessary for publication. I hope this is the first in a long line of collaboration between Wikinews and Jim and perhaps the Huffington Post in general. —Calebrw (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Review

Revision 808066 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I am glad to see this get into a good format. It was also an interesting read and a good article. As per other comments, I hope we can see more of this type of collaboration in the future with Jim and the Post. --DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 20:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 808066 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I am glad to see this get into a good format. It was also an interesting read and a good article. As per other comments, I hope we can see more of this type of collaboration in the future with Jim and the Post. --DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 20:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.