Talk:Naoto Kan elected new Prime Minister of Japan
Add topicConfusion
[edit]What is "Hours before, Hatoyama's cabinet renounced massively to allow the election of the new Prime Minister" trying to say? I have no clue what the "renounced massively" part is all about. What are the "deputies of his side" exactly?
There are other issues to fix here like subject-verb agreement and parallel construction in the last sentence, but I am confused on some of the content of the article first. Either way (talk) 22:41, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 1037105 [Failed]
[edit]  |
Revision 1037105 of this article has been reviewed by Griffinofwales (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1037105 of this article has been reviewed by Griffinofwales (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1037375 [Failed]
[edit]| |
Revision 1037375 of this article has been reviewed by Blurpeace (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 07:51, 5 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Lead needs a date, rewording in the second paragraph, typo in the third, general copyedit required, and an expansion. Miscellaneous style errors as well. This article has to largely be rewritten, IMO. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1037375 of this article has been reviewed by Blurpeace (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 07:51, 5 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Lead needs a date, rewording in the second paragraph, typo in the third, general copyedit required, and an expansion. Miscellaneous style errors as well. This article has to largely be rewritten, IMO. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1037615 [Failed]
[edit]| |
Revision 1037615 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Better, but not quite there yet. It would be nice if the article were longer, a better image caption would be good, it could still use some small fixes and the repeated use of the phrase "prime minister" is redundant- it's used 4 times in 1100 characters. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1037615 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Better, but not quite there yet. It would be nice if the article were longer, a better image caption would be good, it could still use some small fixes and the repeated use of the phrase "prime minister" is redundant- it's used 4 times in 1100 characters. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1037690 [Passed]
[edit]  |
Revision 1037690 of this article has been reviewed by Dendodge (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: This is going stale. Can nobody else smell the mould? The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1037690 of this article has been reviewed by Dendodge (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: This is going stale. Can nobody else smell the mould? The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |