Talk:Nepali capital Kathmandu shut down after rebel strike
Review[edit]
 |
Revision 834791 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 09:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Short but good. --Cirt (talk) 09:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 834791 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 09:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Short but good. --Cirt (talk) 09:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
NPOV[edit]
Why is it NPOV to still call the Maoists "rebels" after conclusion of Nepalese Civil War? And am I the only one who thinks the title is confusing? It brought to my mind the idea that Kathmandu was shut down after a military strike by anti-government forces or something. May I suggest "Nepali capital Kathmandu shuts down for a strike called by Maoists" as an alternative title? 67.244.35.186 (talk) 17:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)