Talk:No un-Islamic hairdo, makeup, or ties for Iranian men
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Blivit in topic Women’s lips were cut with razors
Bad hijab
[edit]In Image:Women shiraz.jpg, one of them is not wearing socks. Both of them have their headscarves perched on their heads so that their hair is showing which can result in several minutes of coaching by the religious police -- minimally. Their clothes is also somewhat tight.
For an example of proper hijab see the wife of Khamenei or any other Iranian official.--Blivit 09:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Fatemeh Javadi's picture here is an example of the right hijab. Use Google Image to find more pictures of her.--Blivit 09:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
have removed the image. pls find other suitable ones. i'm not in favour of the miniskirts one because it adds very little to the article. –Doldrums(talk) 09:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Why do you think that it doesn't add to the article?--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 13:08, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- just to be clear, i'm talking about the miniskirt image in version of the article. all it does is illustrate (not very well) what a miniskirt is, and miniskirts are only brought up in the article in a two-year old comment. –Doldrums(talk) 13:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Aha! Well I've added the Image:Women shiraz.jpg, maybe the caption needs copyediting.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 13:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Much better caption now.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 14:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Aha! Well I've added the Image:Women shiraz.jpg, maybe the caption needs copyediting.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 13:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Women’s lips were cut with razors
[edit]Following the Islamic Revolution "women’s lips were cut with razors in public view to deter others." is true. --Blivit 14:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- sorry for summarily removing the content. i'm not disputing its correctness. the linked-to copy of the book says it's an uncorrected copy of the manuscript. the book, from what i understand, is a compilation from blogs. i'd suggest that the information be attributed to a more reliable source (if common knowledge) or if that is not possible be attributed to this source. –Doldrums(talk) 15:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- I just added REVOLUTIONARY DISINTEGRATION.--Blivit 15:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)