Copyright check shows no major problems. Some of the wording is highly technical so too much source distance would be problematic in terms of changing the meaning.
Some of the style issues were addressed on IRC and fixed.
Newsworthiness issue addressed after mention on IRC to clarify the lead to make it clear why this is news now.
Picture is a PR picture, not one taken by a competing news organization, with the authorship properly credited.
It looks like everything is properly sourced, with nothing appearing to be included that is not covered by the source. Also, sources properly formatted.
Article uses relative dating.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
Copyright check shows no major problems. Some of the wording is highly technical so too much source distance would be problematic in terms of changing the meaning.
Some of the style issues were addressed on IRC and fixed.
Newsworthiness issue addressed after mention on IRC to clarify the lead to make it clear why this is news now.
Picture is a PR picture, not one taken by a competing news organization, with the authorship properly credited.
It looks like everything is properly sourced, with nothing appearing to be included that is not covered by the source. Also, sources properly formatted.
Article uses relative dating.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
