Talk:Researchers discover last common ancestor of apes and monkeys
Add topicReview of revision 1060871 [Failed]
[edit]  |
Revision 1060871 of this article has been reviewed by Pmlineditor (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 08:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1060871 of this article has been reviewed by Pmlineditor (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 08:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1060982 [Passed]
[edit]  |
Revision 1060982 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Just popping in after a comment on WP! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1060982 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Just popping in after a comment on WP! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
New title request
[edit]I know it's a little late but... this was my first Wikinews article, and as you probably noticed, I had a few things to learn during its submission. However, I feel badly about the title. It is not perfectly accurate, although that is what some of the other new agencies are saying. I have read the academic article that defines this new species, and they are not dubbing it as a "last common ancestor." (Even the BBC News article explains this.) Instead, they are saying that is was a very close relative of the last common ancestor. That can be stated succinctly... but not without using specialist terminology.
When I wrote the news article, I was worried about it being rejected because of a overly lengthy title. Therefore I chose to simplify a little... much like the other news agency do. However, I'm beginning to regret the title I chose. Can it be renamed, and if so, can you please help me select a more appropriate title? I'm not sure exactly what length the title is restricted to. – VisionHolder « talk » 00:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)