Talk:Rick Astley releases deluxe editions of his first two albums; prepares 2010 tour

Review of revision 980075 [Failed]

Revision 980075 of this article has been reviewed by Rayboy8 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 00:34, 20 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: The newest source available is at least five days old. Even if this were to have happened today, I'm not entirely sure that you could call this news. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: That's not quite three paragraphs, considering the fact that the last "paragraph" is actually a sentence. Comments by reviewer: Personally, I wouldn't bother with trying to get this article published. I don't really think that there is any point in you trying to either, especially when you consider the fact that this is old news. Sorry. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 980075 of this article has been reviewed by Rayboy8 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 00:34, 20 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: The newest source available is at least five days old. Even if this were to have happened today, I'm not entirely sure that you could call this news. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: That's not quite three paragraphs, considering the fact that the last "paragraph" is actually a sentence. Comments by reviewer: Personally, I wouldn't bother with trying to get this article published. I don't really think that there is any point in you trying to either, especially when you consider the fact that this is old news. Sorry. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

I am personally of the opinion that this, well certainly isn't that newsworthy, is newsworthy enough to be above the threshold, even if not by very much. Bawolff ☺☻ 01:20, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Tried to make it more newsworthy after this review. --Диего Грез (Diego Grez) (говорить) 02:45, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 980199 [Passed]

Revision 980199 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 05:39, 20 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Here's a preview of the Deluxe edition! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 980199 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 05:39, 20 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Here's a preview of the Deluxe edition! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.