Talk:Royal Bank of Scotland shares plummet

Revision 754211 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: I couldn't find a mention of the New York share prices anywhere, although I can't run a search through the text to confirm I haven't just missed it in reading. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Otherwise looks ok Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 754211 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: I couldn't find a mention of the New York share prices anywhere, although I can't run a search through the text to confirm I haven't just missed it in reading. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Otherwise looks ok Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 754211 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Clarification of sourcing received (there's some other stuff just below the main graph on Google Finance). A rare example of two reviews on the same revid! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 754211 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Clarification of sourcing received (there's some other stuff just below the main graph on Google Finance). A rare example of two reviews on the same revid! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.