Talk:Scientists say the moon is slowly shrinking
Add topicReview of revision 1081458 [Passed]
[edit]  |
Revision 1081458 of this article has been reviewed by Red Thunder (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Good work, everything seems to check out. Interesting read. red-thunder. 16:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1081458 of this article has been reviewed by Red Thunder (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Good work, everything seems to check out. Interesting read. red-thunder. 16:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Lack of precision and exclusive use of a non-international system of measurement
[edit]1) "[...] it has shrunk about 325 feet." In its diameter? In its circumference? In its radius? The data provided in this article is meaningless without such indication.
2) The use of a non-international measurement system, especially applied to a scientific topic, shows a parochial approach to the presentation of the information provided. The writer assumes only US readers have access to the Internet. The US and Liberia are currently the only countries still using the US system. Any news article intended for an international audience should have the courtesy to provide measurements in both systems (as the three sources quoted did).
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xolotl (talk • contribs) 04:30, 23 August 2010
- Right! Fixed. --InfantGorilla (talk) 09:36, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Dead Link
[edit]The first source link to the AP article is dead. Kariudo (talk) 03:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)