Talk:Singapore Slingers defeat Darwin All-Stars in eighth Singapore Challenge Series game

• user attended game (court-side seats - thanks for slingers) :)
• also photographed game ..more photos on flickr for reference
• small crowd in attendence....estimate to be 500-750
• Scores

            q1   q2   q3   q4
  Slingers  25   12   23   31
  Darwin    24   11   21    9

• Scoring (summary)

        FG     3Pt    FT
Ng      11/21  5/10  0/1
Sandrin 7/14    0/1   2/2

• previous games

 17/Sep Win - Air 21
 21/Sep Win - Air 21
 30/Sep Win - Pre Foods
 5/Oct  Loss - Sydney
 12/Oct Win - Beijing
 5/Nov Win - Malaysia
 7/Dec Win - Satria Indonesia

Bjornengelhardt (talk) 09:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Note if you actually attended game, you could also tag with {{Original reporting}}. Bawolff ☺☻ 11:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision 743847 of this article has been reviewed by Bawolff (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Image appears to be a copyvio (just because it seems unlikey that you would have an opportunity to take that, and the lack of metadata seems weird. i could be wrong). should use a variety of source, should not just summarize a single source. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Needs to be significantly expanded (preferably longer paragraphs) Comments by reviewer: Needs to be significantly expanded. What sport is it. Why is this game important (Is it a semi-final game, etc). Don't assume the reader knows what you are talking about. Should use more than one source (as it stands the article seems to be a very short summary of the cited source). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 743847 of this article has been reviewed by Bawolff (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Image appears to be a copyvio (just because it seems unlikey that you would have an opportunity to take that, and the lack of metadata seems weird. i could be wrong). should use a variety of source, should not just summarize a single source. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Needs to be significantly expanded (preferably longer paragraphs) Comments by reviewer: Needs to be significantly expanded. What sport is it. Why is this game important (Is it a semi-final game, etc). Don't assume the reader knows what you are talking about. Should use more than one source (as it stands the article seems to be a very short summary of the cited source). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

For the image, I may just be overly-suspicious. I noticed it does not have any meta-data, which is unusual for an image taken directly by a user (or just in general). Are you sure you took it yourself? Bawolff ☺☻ 11:18, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

My apologies, I think i was just being overly suspicious on the image, please ignore any of my ranting on the image. I shouldn't be suspicious of such things without reason. Sorry. Bawolff ☺☻ 23:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

hope the edits are sufficient....still coming to terms with the whole wikinews process

218.185.55.9 09:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Bjornengelhardt (talk) 09:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Allstars, All Stars, or All-Stars

Which is it? Two ways in the article and another online.

Also Singapore is misspelled at least once in the body of the text.

This needs work. —Calebrw (talk) 04:33, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Doing a little looking arround - this somewhat-official looking poster seems to indicate its spelt with a hypen - http://www.singaporeslingers.com/beta/wp-content/plugins/nextgen-gallery/nggshow.php?pid=37&width=400&height=566&mode=watermark Bawolff ☺☻ 04:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Further issues

On a completely separate note, is there anything in the this article to wikilink? Also, the title needs to be changed to "*Sport*", where *Sport* is something like South Asian Basketball League or something. The article says something about the Challenger series, so the title needs that, I'll let you know if I find more issues. —Calebrw (talk) 04:44, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

PS: Use [[w:Article name on wikipedia|Link Text]] to link to Wikipedia. Example [[Barack Obama]] links to Obama's Wikinews page will [[w:Barack Obama|Barack Obama]] links to his Wikipedia page.

Hope this helps. —Calebrw (talk) 04:44, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

from what i gather (mostly from here) They are not playing in a leauge, but are playing against other random teams in the Singapore Challenge Series. Bawolff ☺☻ 06:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Peer review 2

Revision 744525 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:44, 24 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Not checked. NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: See my comments above. Comments by reviewer: See above. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 744525 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:44, 24 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Not checked. NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: See my comments above. Comments by reviewer: See above. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Ok, the spelling issues have been fixed, and the article has been wikified. Are there any other outstanding issues before a slap {{review}} back on this? Bawolff ☺☻ 05:43, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Other note, linked article seems to indicate more than 1000 fans, but the linked article also has an official report on the page that says 1000 (they contradict themselves in there own article). So i think we should go with what Bjornengelhardt says since he was actually there. Bawolff ☺☻ 06:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Review

Revision [1] of this article has been reviewed by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:47, 24 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: No wait any more :). Don't take it serious , it was just a test. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision [2] of this article has been reviewed by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:47, 24 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: No wait any more :). Don't take it serious , it was just a test. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.